FACULDADE DE DIREITO

Direito Processual

Bruno Freire e Silva

Grupo de Pesquisa

60h(sessenta horas)

04(quatro)

Grupo de Pesquisa : Precedentes Vinculantes nos Tribunais do Trabalho

3ª feira

16:00h

Teórica

Prática

60h(sessenta horas)

04(quatro)

**************

Mestrado acadêmico e Doutorado

Diagnosticar todos os procedentes vinculantes nos Tribunais do Trabalho e no Supremo Tribunal Federal em relação aos temas trabalhistas, extraindo a tese jurídica, fundamentação, a ratio decindendi, o obiter dictum, como forma de orientar os operadores do direito laboral em relação às novas normas jurídicas inseridas no sistema

AKANMIDU, Raphael A. The Morality of Precedent in Law, Ratio Juris, v. 14, n. 2, jun. 2001. ANDREWS, Neil. O Moderno Processo Civil: formas judiciais e alternativas de resolução de conflitos na Inglaterra. Tradução de Teresa Arruda Alvim Wambier. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2009. AUSTIN, John. Lectures on jurisprudence. or the philosophy of positive law. 5. Ed. rev. London: John Murray. 1911. Vol. 2. BANKOWSKI, Zenon; Maccormick, Neil; Marshall, Geoffrey. Precedente in the United Kingdom. Interpreting precedentes: comparative study. London: Dartmouth.1997. BANKOWSKI, Zenon; Marshall, Geoffrey. Precedent in the United Kingdom. Interpreting precedents: a comparative study. London: Dartmouth. 1997. BENDITT, Theodore M. The rule of precedente. In: Goldstein. L. (ed.). Precedent in law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1987. BENNETT. Robert W. A Dissent on Dissent. Judicature. V. 74. n. 5. BENTHAN, Jeremy. Rationale of Judicial evidence, London: Hunt and Clarke, 1827. BENTHAN, Jeremy. Truth versus Ashhurst; or law as it is. Contrasted with wath it is said to be. The Works of Jeremy Bentham (published under the superintendence of his executor. John Bowring). Edinburgh: Willian Tait 1843. Vol. 5. BICKEL, Alexander. The least dangerous branch. New Haven: Yale Univeresity Press. 1986. BISHOP, Joel Prentiss. Common law and Codification or The Common law as a system of Reasoning – How and Why essential to good government; what its perils, and how averted. Chicago: Law Book Publishers, 1888. BLACKSTONE, William. Commentaries on the law of Englad. Chicago: The Univerity of Chicago Press. 1979. BLEICH, J.; Friedland, M.; Feinberg, A; Powell. D. Supreme Court Watch: stealth overruling-overturning precedente without saying so. San Francisco Attorney. San Francisco. Vol. 33. n. 43. Fall 2007. BLUME, Lawrence E.; Rubinfeld, Daniel L. The dynamics of the legal process. Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 11. 1982. BRADFORD, C. S. Following dead precedente: the Supreme Court`s ill-advised rejection of anticipatory overruling. Fordham Law Review. New York. Vol. 59. Out. 1990. BRONAUGH, Richard. Persuasive Precedent. In: GOLDSTEIN, Laurence (ed.), Precedent in Law, pp. 217-247. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987. CALABRESI, Guido. A common law for the age of statutes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1982. CAMINKER, Evan H. Precedent and prediction: the forward-looking aspects of inferior court decision making. Texas e Review. Austin. Vol. 73, n. 1. Nov. 1994. CAMINKER, Evan H. Why must inferior courts obey superior court precedentes? Stanford Law Review. Stanford. Vol. 46. Abr. 1994. CAPPELLETI, Mauro. El proceso como fenômeno social de masa. Proceso, ideologias. Sociedad. Trad. Santiago Sentís Melendo e Tomás A. Banzhaf. Buenos Aires: EJEA. 1974. CAPPELLETTI, Mauro. Acesso à Justiça. Trad. Ellen Gracie. Porto Alegre: Fabris. 1988. CARDOZO, Benjamin N. The nature of judicial process. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1921. CHAYES, Abram. The role of the judge in public law litigantion. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 89. maio 1976. CHIARLONI, Sergio. Efficacia del precedente giudiziario e tipologia dei contrasti di giurisprudenzia. Revista de Processo RePro. São Paulo, n. 229, 2014. CHIASSONI, Pierluigi. Il precedente giudiziale: tre esercizi di disincanto, Analisi e diritto, Firenze, 2004. COLE, Charles D. Stare decisis na cultura jurídica dos Estados Unidos. O sistema de precedente vinculante do common law. Tradução de Maria Cristina Zucchi. Revista dos Tribunais. São Paulo, n. 752, 1998. CORWIN, Edward S. The doctrine of judicial review. Its legal and historical basis and other essas. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1914. CROSS, Rupert; Harris J. W. Precedent in English law. Oxford University Press UK (1991). CROSS, Rupert; Harris, J. W. Precedent in English law. Oxford: Clrendon Press. 1991. CURRIE, Brainerd. Mutuality of Collateral Estoppel: Limits of the Bernherd doc-trine. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 9. 1957. DAMASKA, Mirjan. The faces of justice and state authority. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1986. DAVIS, John F. REYNOLDS. William L. Juridical Cripples: Plurality Opinions in the Supreme Court. Duke Law Jounal. v. 59. 1974. DAVIS, R. A re-examination of the doctrine of MacPherson v. Buick and its application and extension in the State of New York. Fordham Law Review, 1995. DELANEY, Sarah K. Stare decisis v. The “New Majority”; the Michigan Supreme Court’s practice of overruling precedent. 1998-2002. Albany Law Review. Albany. Vol. 66. n. 871. 2003 DEUTSCH, Jan G. Precedent and adjudication. Yale Law Journal. New Haven. vol. 83. jul. 1974. DORF, Michael; TRIBE, Laurence. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1991. DOUGLAS, William 0. The Dissent: A Safeguard of Democracy. Journal of the American Judicature Society. v. 32. DUXBURY, Neil. The nature and authority of precedent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DUXBURY, Neil. The nature and authority of precedente. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2008. DWORKIN, Ronald. Freedom’s law: The moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1996. DWORKIN, Ronald. O Império do Direito, tradução Jefferson Luiz Camargo; revisão técnica Gildo Sá Leitão Rios. 2ª edição, São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007. EISENBERG, Melvin Aron. The nature of the common law. Cambridge [Mass], London, Harvard University Press, 1991. EISENBERG, Melvin Aron. The nature of the common law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1998. ELY, John Hart. Democracy and distrut: a theory of judicial review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1980. Engelmann, Arthur. Modern Continental procedure. A history of continental civil procedure. New York: Kelley. 1969. EVANS, Jim. Change in the doctrine of precedent during the nineteenth century. In: GOLDSTEIN, Laurence. Precedent in Law, Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987. EVANS, Jim. Precedent in the nineteenth century. Precedent in law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1987. FEDERMAN, Howard. Judicial overruling. Time for a new general rule. Michigan Bar Journal, set. 2004. FINE, Toni M. O uso do precedente e o papel do princípio do stare decisis no sistema legal norte-americano. Revista dos Tribunais. São Paulo, v.89, n. 782, dez. 2000. FUX, Luiz. Processo Civil Contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2020. FUX, Luiz. Teoria Geral do Processo Civil. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2020. GASCÓN ABELLÁN, Marina, La técnica del precedente y la argumentación racional. Ed. Tecnos, Madrid, 1993. GERHARDT, Michael J. The power of precedente. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008. GLOW, Lisa L., Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Arizona: Fair Litigation v. Judicial Economy. Arizona Law Review. vol. 30. 1988. GOODHART, Arthur L. Determining the ratio decidendi of a case. Essays in jurisprudence and the common law. Cambridge: University Press. 1931. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1988. HARRISON, John. The power of congress over the rule of precedent. 50 DUKE LJ. 503, 513 n.25 (2000). HART, H. L. A. Essays on Bentham: Studies on Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982. HASSEMER, Winfried. Sistema jurídico e codificação: a vinculação do juiz à lei. HAYWARD, Allison. The Per Curiam Opinion of Steel: Buckley v. Valeo as Superprecedent? Cato Supreme Court Review (2005-06). HEALY, Thomas, Stare decisis and the Constitution: Four Questions and Answers. Notre Dame Law Review, v. 83, 2008 HEINEr, Ronald A. Imperfect decisions and the law: on the law: on the Evolution of legal precedente and rules. Journal of Legal Studies. n. 15. 1986. HEINSZ, Thimothy J. Grieve it again: of stare decisis. res judicata and colateral estoppels in labor arbitration. Boston College Law Revies. vol. 38. Mar. 1997. HERNANDO, Francisco José. Jurisprudencia vinculante: una necessidad del estado de derecho. Revista de Economia y Derecho. Vol. 3. n. 10. 2006. HERNANDO, Francisco José. Jurisprudencia vinculante: unicidade del estado de derecho. Revista de Economia y Derecho. Vol. 3. n. 10. 2006. HERSHOVITZ, Scott. Integrity and Stare decisis. In: HERSHOVITZ, Scott. (Ed.). Exploring Law’s Empire. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008 HOCHSCHILD, Adam S. The Modern Problem of Supreme Court Plurality Decision: Interpretation in Historial Perspective. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy. V. 4. HOCHSCHILD, Adam S. The Modern Problem of Supreme Court Plurality Decision: Interpretation in Historical Perspective. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy. v. 4. Introdução à filosofia do direito e à teoria do direito contemporâneas, Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. 2002. JACOB, Marc. Precedents and case-based reasoning in the European Court of Justice. Cambridge University Press; Reprint edition (31 Mar. 2016) JAMES H. Fowler and Sangick Jeon, The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent. Published in Social Networks, 2008. JARAMILLO, Javier Tamayo; JARAMILLO J. Carlos Ignacio. El precedente judicial em Colombia: papel y valor assignados a la jurisprudência. Bogota? : Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Ciencias Juri?dicas : Grupo Editorial Iban?ez, 2012 KELMAN, Maurice. Anticipatory stare decisis. University of Kansas Law Review. 1959. KENT, James. Commentaries on american law. Nabu Press (August 13, 2011) KNIFFIN, Margaret N. Overruling Supreme Court precedentes: anticipatory action by Unites States courts of appeals. Fordham Law Review. 1982. KNIFFIN, Margaret N. Overruling Supreme Court precedents: anticipatory actions by United States court of appeals. 51 FordhamL. Rev.53 (1982). KORNHAUSER, A. An economic perspective ons tare decisis. Chicago-Kent Law Review. n. 65. 1989. KOZEL, Randy. Precedent and Reliance, 62 Emory L.J. 1459, 1464 (2013) LAMOND, Grant. Do Precedents Create Rules?. Legal Theory, vol 11, n. 1, pp. 1-26, 2005 LANDES, William M.; POSNER, Richard. "Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis." Journal of Law and Economics, (September 1976). Law as interpretation. Texas Law Review. vol. 60. Law’s empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1986. LEDERMAN, Howard Yale. Judicial overruling. Michigan Bar Journal. Lansing. vol. 83. set. 2004. LEE, Thomas R. Stare decisis in economic perspective: a economic analysis of the Supreme Court’s douctrine of precedente. North Carolina Law Review. n. 78. 2000. LEE, Thomas. Stare Decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 647, 661-62 (1999) LINDQUIST, S.; Pybas, K. State Supreme Court decisions to overruling precedente: 1965-1996. Justice System Journal. Williamsburg. Vol. 20. 1998. LLEWELLYN, Karl. The case law system in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1989. LYONS, David. Formal justice and judicial precedent. Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 38. Abr. 1985. MACCORMICK, D. Neil; SUMMERS, Robert S. Interpreting Precedents: a comparative study. England: Dartmouth, 1997 MACCORMICK, Neil. Can stare decisis be abolished? Judicial Review. 1966. MALTZ, Earl M. Abortion, Precedent, and the Constitution: A Comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 68 Notre Dame L. Rev. 11 (1992). MANCUSO, Rodolfo Camargo. Sistema brasileiro de precedentes: natureza eficácia. São Paulo: Ed. RT. 2014. MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme. A ética dos precedentes. São Paulo: Ed. RT. 2014. MARKMAN, Stephen. Precedent: tension between continuity in the law and the perpetuation of wrong decisions. Texas Review of Law & amp; Politics. vol. 8, Spring 2004. MARSHALL, Geoffrey. What is binding in a precedent. Interpreting precedents: a comparative study. London: Dartmouth. 1997. MATTEI, Ugo. Stare decisis: il valore del precedente giudiziario negli Stati Uniti d’América. Giuffrè, 1988. MENDES, Aluisio Gonçalves de Castro (Org.). O novo Código de Processo Civil. Rio de Janeiro: EMARF, 2015. MENDES, Aluisio Gonçalves de Castro. Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas: Sistematização, Análise e Interpretação do Novo Instituto Processual. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2017. MENDES, Aluisio Gonçalves de Castro; NUNES, Dierle; JAYME, Fernando Gonzaga (Coord.). A nova aplicação da jurisprudência e precedentes no CPC/2015. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2018. MENDES, Aluisio Gonçalves de Castro; José Sotero Mello Porto. Incidente de Assunção de Competência. Rio de Janeiro: GZ Editora, 2020. MENDES, Aluisio Gonçalves de Castro; José Sotero Mello Porto (Coord.). Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas: Panorama e perspectivas. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2020. MENDES, Aluisio Gonçalves de Castro; MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme; WAMBIER, Teresa Arruda Alvim. Direito jurisprudencial, vol. II. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2014. MERRYMAN, John Henry; Pérez-Perdomo. Rogelio. The civil lar tradition: an introduction to the legal systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2007. MIGUEL, Alfonso Ruiz; Bankowski, Zenon; MacCormick, Neil; Morawski. Lech. Rationales for precedent. Interpreting precedents: a comparative study. London: Dartmouth. 1997. MONTROSE, J. L. Ratio decidendi and the House of Lords. The Modern Law Review. vol. 20. 1957. MORAWSKI, Lech; Miguel, Alfonso Ruiz. Rationales for precedente. Interpreting precedentes: a comparative study. London: Dartmouth. 1997. MUNÕZ, Martín Oroco. La creación judicial del derecho y el precedente vinculante. Pamplona. España, Editorial Aranzadi, 2011. NELSON, Caleb. Stare Decisis and Demonstrably Erroneous Precedents, 87 VA.L.REV. 1, 1 (2001). NELSON, Caleb. Stare decisis and demonstrably erroneous precedent. Virginia Law Review. vol. 87. Mar. 2001. NELSON, William E. Marbury v. Madison: the origins and legacy of judicial review. Lawrence; University Press of Kansas. 2000. NOVAK, Linda. The precedential value of Supreme Court Plurality Decisions. Columbia Law Review. vol. 80. n.4 (May. 1980). ORTOLAN, Marcelo Augusto Bieh. Common Law. Judicial Review e Stare Decisis: Uma abordagem histórica do Sistema de controle de constitucionalidade anglo-americano em perspectiva comparada com o sistema brasileiro. In A força dos precedentes. 2. Ed. Coord. Luiz Guilherme Marinoni. Salvador: JusPodivm. 2012. PAULSEN, Michael Stokes. Does the Supreme Court’s Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court's Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis?, 86 N.C. L. Rev. 1165, 1172 (2008). PEIXOTO, Ravi de Medeiros. Superação de Precedente e Segurança Jurídica. 3ª Ed. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2018. POSNEr, Richard A. Judicial behavior and performance: an economic approach. Florida State University Law Review. vol. 32. 2005. POSTEMA, Gerald J. Some roots of our notion of precedent. Precedent in law. Oxford: Clareon Press. 1987. Precedent in English and Continental law. Law Quaterly Review. vol. 50. 1934. PYBAS, K.; Lindquist, S. State Supreme Court decisions to overruling precedent: 1965-1996. Justice System Journal. Williamsburg. Vol. 20. 1998. Revista Trimestrale di Diritto e Procedura Civile. Numero Speciale: Due iceberg a confronto: le derive di common law e civil law. 2009. ROGERS, John M. Lower court application of the “overruling law” of higher courts. Legal Theory. 1995. SCALIA, Antonin. A matter of interpretation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 1997. SCHAUER, Frederick. Has precedent ever really mattered in the supreme Court? Georgia State University Law Review. vol. 24. Winter 2007. SCOFIELd, Robert G. Goodhart’s concession: defending ratio decidendi from logical positivism and legal realism in the first half of the twentieth century. King’s College Law Journal. Vol. 16. 2005. SCOTT, Austin Wakeman. Collateral Estoppel by judgment. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 56. 1942. SELLERS, Mortimer Newlin Stead. The Doctrine of Precedent in the United States of America (September 3, 2008) SÈROUSSI, Roland. Introdução ao Direito inglês e norte-americano. Landy, 2001. SESMA, Victoria Iturralde. El precedente en el common law. Madri, ES: Civitas, 1995 SHANNON, Bradley Scott. The retroactive and prospective application of judicial decisions. Harvard Journal of Law & amp; Public Policy. Cambridge. Vol. 26. Summer 2003. SILTALA, Raimo. A theory of precedent: from analytical positivism to a post-analytical philosophy of law. Hart Publishing, 2000. SILVA, Bruno Freire e Silva. O Novo CPC e o Processo do Trabalho – Vol. V.: Dos Processos nos Tribunais e dos Meios de Impugnação das Decisões Judiciais. São Paulo: LTr, 2021. No prelo. SIMPSON, A. W. B. The common law and legal theory. Oxford essay in jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1973 – The ratio decidendi of a case. The Modern Law Review. vol. 21. 1958. SIMPSON, A. W. Brian. The ratio decidendi of a case and the doctrine of binding precedent. In: SIMPSON, A. W. Brian (ed.), Oxford essays in jurisprudence, pp. 148--175. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973 SINCLAIR, Michael. Precedent, Super-Precedent. George Mason Law Review. 2007. SPECTOR, Horacio. Judicial review. rights and democracy. Law and Philosophy. n. 22. 2003. STEARNS, M.; Abramowicz, M. Defining dicta. Stanford Law Review. Stanford. Vol. 57. Mar. 2005. SUMMERS, Robert S. Precedent in the United States (New York State). Interpreting precedents: a comparative study. London: Dartmouth. 1997. TARUFFO, Michele. “Collateral estoppel” e giudicato sulle questioni, revista di diritto processuale, 1972. TEMER, Sofia. Incidente de Resolução de Demandas Repetitivas. Salvador: Podivm, 2018. The distinction between judicial dicta and obiter dicta. Los Angeles Lawyer. Los Angeles. Vol. 25. out. 2002. The force of precedente in the lower courts. Wayne Law Review. 1967. THURMON, Mark Alan. When the court divides: reconsidering the precedential value of Supreme Court plurality decisions. Duke Law Journal. Durham. vol. 42. Nov. 1992. TRAYNOR, Roger J. Quo vadis. prospective overruling: a question of judicial responsibility. Hastings Law Journal. San Francisco. vol. 50. Abr. 1999. TREANOR, William Michael. Prospective overruling and the revival of unconstitutional statues. Columbia Law Review. New York. vol. 93. Dez. 1993. TUSHNET, Mark. Os precedentes judiciais nos Estados Unidos. Revista de Processo RePro. São Paulo, n. 218, 2013. VON MOSCHZISKER, Robert. Stare Decisis in Courts of Last Resort, 37 Harv. L. Rev. 409, 410 (1924).